International legal services in Turkey › Debt collection › Interim attachment
Interim Attachment in Turkey: 10-Day Action Guide
Legal information notice
This publication provides general information on Turkish law as of its stated review date. It does not create an attorney–client relationship; documents, time limits, jurisdiction and current rules require a matter-specific assessment.
Contact usDirect answer: Interim attachment in Turkey is a court-ordered, temporary seizure used to secure an eligible monetary claim before final recovery. For a due, unsecured money debt, the creditor must substantiate the claim and the legal conditions. A claim that is not yet due is subject to narrower statutory grounds. The court may require security, and a favourable order must currently be presented for enforcement within ten days from the date of the decision or it automatically lapses.

This guide is written for foreign suppliers, exporters, service providers, lenders, investors and judgment or award creditors concerned that Turkish assets may disappear before payment. It explains the private-debt framework under the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law, not tax or public-revenue attachment. Attorney Emirhan Keskin is registered with the Mersin Bar Association under registration number 5507. An assessment can begin remotely, but neither an attachment order nor recovery can be guaranteed.
Interim attachment in Turkey: first-screen table
| Question | What to establish | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Is this a monetary claim? | Principal, currency, due date and legal basis | Interim attachment is designed to secure payment, not every form of performance |
| Is the debt secured by a pledge? | Mortgage, pledge, collateral and amount covered | The general rule concerns an unsecured monetary claim; exceptions require separate analysis |
| Is the claim due? | Contract, invoice, acceptance and maturity evidence | A non-due debt needs one of the narrower statutory circumstances |
| Can the claim be substantiated now? | Contract, order, delivery, admission, ledger and correspondence | The court evaluates the documents at a provisional stage; an allegation alone is insufficient |
| Which Turkish court and assets? | Jurisdiction facts, debtor identity and lawful asset information | A useful order must be sought and executed through competent authorities |
| Can security and rapid follow-up be arranged? | Potential deposit or guarantee and a deadline plan | Security and short enforcement/completion periods can decide whether protection survives |
What does interim attachment actually do?
The Turkish Ministry of Justice describes interim attachment as a mechanism by which a court permits advance, temporary seizure of a debtor’s assets to secure timely payment of a money claim. It is provisional protection. It does not finally determine that the creditor is right, transfer ownership of an asset or immediately pay the creditor.
The measure may reach eligible movable or immovable assets, receivables and other rights belonging to the debtor, including assets held by a third person, within the scope of the order and enforcement law. Exemptions, ownership disputes, prior rights, valuation and priority rules remain relevant. A broad request cannot replace identification of the claim and a proportionate recovery objective.
1. Confirm that the claim is a money debt
Interim attachment in Turkey principally protects a monetary receivable. A demand to deliver goods, transfer shares, complete construction, hand over property or stop an act is not automatically converted into an attachment claim. If the dispute concerns non-monetary performance, an interim injunction or another procedural remedy may need separate assessment.
State the principal amount, currency, maturity, legal basis and any interest or contractual penalty separately. A claim described only as “all losses” may be difficult to evaluate at the provisional stage. Contingent, future or unliquidated damage claims require careful analysis of whether a money debt exists and whether it is sufficiently substantiated.
2. Check maturity and security over the debt
The ordinary statutory starting point is a due money debt not secured by a pledge. Review invoices, payment milestones, acceptance provisions, acceleration clauses, default notices and any agreed extension. A bookkeeping due date does not override the signed contract or later amendment.
A mortgage, share pledge, account pledge, goods pledge or other proprietary security must be reviewed for the amount and assets it covers. The existence of some security does not answer every issue; an uncovered balance or a statutory exception may require separate analysis. The petition should not conceal collateral that could affect eligibility.
When can a non-due claim qualify?
The Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law provides narrower grounds for a debt that has not yet matured. The current framework includes circumstances such as the debtor lacking a defined place of residence or preparing to hide assets, absconding, or carrying out fraudulent transactions to evade obligations and prejudice the creditor. These are fact-sensitive statutory grounds, not assumptions that arise whenever payment confidence falls.
If the relevant non-due ground exists, statutory consequences concerning acceleration may also follow. The exact provision and exceptions must be checked against the current law and contract. A creditor should document the event with reliable dates and sources rather than repeat rumours about the debtor.
3. Build a coherent evidence file
The creditor must present evidence capable of satisfying the court, at this provisional stage, about the receivable and the attachment ground. Organise the contract, purchase order, delivery record, acceptance, invoice, account statement, bank record, acknowledgment, correspondence, notice and any negotiable instrument as one dated chain.
For services or technology work, include outputs, change requests, time records, access logs and acceptance communications. For goods, include transport, customs, warehouse, inspection and return records. If the debtor alleges defects, set-off or non-delivery, address that evidence openly. The court should not discover a material defence only from the other side.
4. Prove urgency without exaggeration
For a due, unsecured money claim, a creditor should still explain why provisional protection is requested and why the identified assets matter. For a non-due claim, the special statutory ground must be substantiated. Generic statements such as “the debtor may sell assets” or a refusal to answer one email do not by themselves establish asset concealment or fraud.
Useful material may include verifiable disposal steps, transfers to related parties, closure of premises, inconsistent registered information, removal of inventory, admissions, insolvency filings or concrete preparation to leave. Evidence must be acquired lawfully. Leaked bank, population, communications or location data should not be purchased or submitted.
5. Select the court and procedural route
Jurisdiction and court type depend on the underlying relationship, parties, agreement, place of performance, debtor and procedural posture. A commercial invoice dispute, consumer transaction, employment claim and maritime claim do not necessarily follow the same forum rules. An arbitration or foreign-jurisdiction clause must be reviewed before filing.
The court considering interim attachment is not necessarily deciding the final merits at that moment. If a lawsuit, arbitration, enforcement proceeding or foreign decision already exists, the procedural route and competence analysis change. For an existing foreign judgment or arbitral award, also review the recognition and enforcement guide.
May the court decide without hearing the debtor?
Because advance warning can defeat provisional protection, the court may examine an interim attachment request without first hearing the debtor. That does not remove the debtor’s defence rights. After execution or service, the debtor and affected third parties may have objection, complaint or security-based remedies under short statutory periods.
Ex parte consideration is not a licence to omit adverse facts. The creditor and counsel should present the material facts accurately. Misleading the court can affect the order, costs, damages, professional responsibility and the credibility of the merits case.
6. Prepare for creditor security
A creditor that later proves unjustified can be liable for losses caused to the debtor and third parties. The general rule therefore requires security before interim attachment, subject to the statutory treatment of claims based on a judgment and judicial discretion for specified judgment-like documents. The amount and acceptable form are determined in the case; a universal percentage should not be promised online.
A foreign individual or company may also face a separate security question under Turkish private international law, subject to treaty, reciprocity and statutory exemptions. This is not automatically the same security as protection against wrongful attachment. The client should budget for court fees, enforcement expenses, translation and both potential security analyses.
7. The ten-day enforcement deadline
A favourable order is not self-executing. Under the current wording of Article 261, the creditor must request enforcement through the competent enforcement office within ten days from the date the court gives the order; otherwise the order automatically lapses. In Decision E.2025/142, K.2025/254, published on 9 March 2026, the Constitutional Court rejected the challenge to the phrase making the period run from the decision date.
This means the file must be monitored actively rather than waiting for ordinary service. The security, certified order, enforcement application, expenses, target information and local coordination should be prepared in advance. The official Constitutional Court decision database records the current ruling.
8. Execution through the enforcement office
The enforcement office implements the court order under the applicable seizure rules. Bank receivables, real property, vehicles, company receivables, movables or third-party claims may involve different notices and registry steps. The order does not authorise the creditor to take property personally or contact institutions as though it were a public authority.
Exact debtor identifiers matter. A parent company, subsidiary, branch, shareholder and director are not interchangeable owners. A request against the wrong legal person can fail and create loss. Public company records and client-held asset information should be reconciled before execution.
9. Complete the merits or enforcement route
Interim attachment must be connected to the underlying recovery route. If protection was obtained before a lawsuit or enforcement proceeding, separate short statutory periods govern the complementary action. Depending on the posture and service of the execution record, a seven-day period may require the creditor to commence the appropriate enforcement or merits step. Objection to a payment order can trigger another short route.
Do not calculate these periods from a generic website paragraph. Record the decision date, execution date, attendance, service date, pending proceeding and debtor objection, then identify the exact completion step under the current text. Missing it can cause the attachment to fall even though it was properly executed.
10. Plan for objections and wrongful-attachment risk
A debtor not heard before the order may challenge matters such as jurisdiction, the grounds for attachment or security within the applicable framework and short periods. Third parties can raise ownership and other rights. The debtor may also seek release or modification against acceptable security where statutory conditions are met.
The creditor should reassess the case after receiving the objection and underlying documents. If the original evidence proves incomplete, settlement, replacement security or withdrawal may reduce further harm. Continuing a disproportionate attachment can increase damages exposure. The Constitutional Court has also emphasised that provisional burdens on property must not continue unreasonably.
Interim attachment, final attachment or injunction?
| Measure | Primary function | Common point of confusion |
|---|---|---|
| Interim attachment | Temporarily secure an eligible monetary claim before final collection | It is not a final judgment and does not itself pay the creditor |
| Final/enforcement attachment | Seize assets within an enforceable debt-recovery proceeding | It requires the procedural basis for final execution |
| Interim injunction | Protect a right or prevent a change pending determination | It is not an interchangeable shortcut for every money claim |
| Contractual security | Provide agreed collateral such as a pledge, mortgage or guarantee | Its existence and scope can affect attachment eligibility and strategy |
| Criminal seizure | Serve criminal-procedure purposes under a competent authority’s decision | A disputed invoice should not be turned into a criminal allegation merely to pressure payment |
Assets, priority and realistic recovery
Interim attachment in Turkey does not guarantee that attachable assets exist, retain value or will ultimately be available to this creditor. Ownership, exemptions, prior pledges, earlier seizures, public claims, insolvency, third-party rights and saleability all affect recovery. A registry entry is not the same as net realisable value. Use the asset investigation in Turkey guide to test lawful access, ownership, priority and expected net proceeds.
The measure does not automatically create the commercial equivalent of a first-ranking pledge. Participation and priority questions depend on the later enforcement context. Before spending on urgent relief, compare the claim value, evidence strength, security requirement, asset quality, competing claims and expected enforcement cost.
Foreign creditor and remote representation
A foreign creditor can usually send the preliminary file electronically and hold remote meetings. Formal filing requires suitable authority and, for a company, evidence that the signatory can issue it. Foreign public or corporate documents may require apostille or legalisation and sworn Turkish translation depending on their nature and use.
Use the power of attorney for Turkey from abroad guide before signing. A private person’s consular route should not be assumed to work for a foreign legal entity. Physical attendance depends on evidence, hearing and authority requirements rather than nationality alone.
A rapid action workflow
- Verify the debtor: exact Turkish identity, status, registered address and responsible contracting entity.
- Define the claim: principal, currency, due date, interest and the money-debt basis.
- Review collateral: pledge, mortgage, guarantee and the amount actually secured.
- Build evidence: contract, order, performance, delivery, acceptance, invoice and non-payment.
- Test the ground: maturity and, if not due, the specific statutory circumstance with lawful proof.
- Choose forum: court type, jurisdiction, arbitration, foreign proceeding and existing enforcement posture.
- Budget security: wrongful-attachment security, possible foreign-party security, fees and translation.
- Prepare execution: monitor the order and assemble the enforcement-office package before decision.
- Protect deadlines: request enforcement within the current ten-day period and calendar every follow-up.
- Complete recovery: start or continue the correct enforcement, mediation, litigation or arbitration route.
Documents for an initial assessment
- signed contract, terms, purchase order and amendments;
- invoice-by-invoice ledger, due dates, credits and partial payments;
- delivery, customs, transport, acceptance or service-performance records;
- complete correspondence, objections, admissions and settlement exchanges;
- debtor’s registered identity, MERSIS/tax details and known addresses;
- mortgages, pledges, guarantees, cheques, notes and other security;
- lawfully obtained evidence of an actual disposal or evasion risk;
- known asset information with its source and date;
- jurisdiction, governing-law and arbitration provisions;
- pending court, arbitration, mediation or enforcement documents;
- foreign company registry and signatory-authority documents; and
- a concise chronology identifying every imminent deadline.
Frequently asked questions
Can interim attachment in Turkey be obtained for any unpaid invoice?
No. The court must assess the monetary claim, maturity, collateral, evidence, jurisdiction and statutory conditions. An invoice alone and a general fear of non-payment do not guarantee an order.
Must the debt already be due?
A due, unsecured money debt is the ordinary starting point. A non-due debt can qualify only under narrower statutory circumstances that must be substantiated.
Will the debtor be heard before the order?
Not necessarily. The court may consider provisional protection without advance notice, while the debtor and affected third parties retain later objection and other remedies.
Is creditor security always required?
Security is the general rule because an unjustified attachment can cause compensable loss. The statute treats judgment-based and certain judgment-like documents differently, and the court determines the case-specific requirement.
What is the current deadline to execute the order?
The current rule requires the creditor to request enforcement within ten days from the decision date. The Constitutional Court rejected a 2025 challenge to that starting point; active monitoring is essential.
Does interim attachment give the creditor payment priority?
Not automatically. Prior security, other attachments, public claims, insolvency and participation rules can affect priority and net recovery.
Can a foreign company apply remotely?
The assessment and many procedural steps can usually be coordinated remotely under suitable authority. Corporate signatory, apostille/legalisation and Turkish translation requirements must be planned.
Can leaked bank data be used to find assets?
No unlawful shortcut should be used. Asset work must rely on lawful client-held, public or procedurally accessible information.
Is interim attachment the same as an injunction?
No. Interim attachment secures an eligible monetary claim; an injunction protects a right through a different framework. The correct remedy depends on the requested result.
How can I contact Attorney Emirhan Keskin?
Call +90 552 224 43 66, send a WhatsApp message or email avukatemirhankeskin@gmail.com. Include the claim amount, due date, evidence, debtor identity and concrete asset risk.
Official sources
- Ministry of Justice legal dictionary – attachment and interim attachment
- Constitutional Court E.2025/142, K.2025/254 – ten-day enforcement period
- Ministry of Justice – Enforcement Affairs Department
- Official enforcement-office directorates
- Ministry of Justice UYAP services
- Official Turkish legislation database
Contact the Mersin office
Send the contract, evidence chain, claim calculation, debtor’s exact identity, known Turkish assets, concrete risk evidence, existing proceeding details and deadlines. Attorney Emirhan Keskin’s office is at İhsaniye Mahallesi, 4903 Sokak, Profit İş Merkezi No:23, Floor 3, Office 14, Akdeniz, Mersin, Turkey.
Telephone: +90 552 224 43 66
WhatsApp: Send the urgent file summary
Email: avukatemirhankeskin@gmail.com
General legal information only. Eligibility, court, evidence, security, execution, objections, deadlines, priority and recovery depend on the current law and file. No attachment or payment outcome is guaranteed.
Publication transparency
Publisher profile: Attorney Emirhan Keskin
Professional registration statement: Mersin Bar Association, registration no. 5507 · Verify through the TBB lawyer search
Published: · Page updated: . The page-update date is not a legal-review date.
Legal review: A legal-review statement appears only after an approval record is tied to the current content version.
General official verification portals: Mevzuat · Resmî Gazete · UYAP. These are general portals and do not, by themselves, source every statement on this page.


